The text of the bill voted two weeks ago - among others Key Steps - extends from 12 to 24 months the mandate of the Director, establishes the right of see at any moment the receipts and invoices to the accounting basis pool and makes it easier to vote at the meeting, bypassing the malpractice of the low turnout that often paralyzes the larger buildings. For ordinary resolution, the second call is now in the majority of those present, representing at least one third of the condominiums and one-third of thousandths. With the reform, however, simply have the same parts per thousand, although the majority of voters is less than a third of the condominiums.
Ten of the main changes are outlined in the right panel, which compares with the current guidelines in the approval process. In many cases, the philosophy of the reform is been to plug holes and filing defects of the old rules approved in 1942. Some examples? Today the administrator hardly know exactly who they really are the owners of the apartments, and it often happens that injunctions directed against the wrong people (or against one of the joint holders) then prove ineffective. Moreover, some courts have imposed sentences administrator to search personal data so accurate as to be practically impossible.
With the reform, however, any change to the data, delivery or land shall be submitted to the administrator in writing within 60 days. Otherwise, information retrieval will be at the expense of the condominium in question.
Another example: today who violates house rules may be ordered to pay up to 100 pounds (100 pounds!) Because the amount indicated in the code has never been adequate, and the judges are uncertain even as to whether a regulation type of contract (approved by all or arranged by the manufacturer of the building) higher fixed penalties. Under the new rules, the penalty increases to 100 € basis, which can become 1,000 in case of relapse. In addition, the collection will also be possible to proceed with injunction.
The text does not only earned praise, but also some criticism. It is not like in particular, the increased responsibilities of directors and, more generally, the bureaucratization of many aspects of communal life. Consider, for example, the need to communicate to the assembly works or changes of use to be run on private property.
Frank Miller (PDL), rapporteur of the Senate measure, greets the start of the bill to the House: "It is a text on which we work for nine years, counting the previous term. The large share achieved in the Senate gives me hope that the time may be short. "
In the House, however, there is already another bill, tabled by Mr Lino Duilio (Pd), which differs from the Senate in a few places, but significant. Among them, giving the building the legal capacity, the establishment of a guarantee fund against mismanagement of the directors (operated with a percentage of their fees, it is assumed at 4%) and the ability to act by a majority also selling of the common (and not just the exchange or change of intended use, as in the text passed by the Senate).
"You have to decide if the text comes from the other branch of Parliament or appointing a select committee which takes account of both Testaments," Duilio said. In any case, the time should be short. "Within a month or a month and a half - he continues - the House would complete the examination. " This means that even with an eventual return to the Senate, the reform could be law before the summer. Everything hangs on, of course, the fate of the term, but if the House fails to complete the examination, the bill would still be fast-tracked in the next Parliament. (Cit.Casa24)
0 comments:
Post a Comment